BPOI Banner
How Telegram Games Can Be More Sustainable in the Post-P2E Era How Telegram Games Can Be More Sustainable in the Post-P2E Era

How Telegram Games Can Be More Sustainable in the Post-P2E Era

The gaming world is abuzz with the potential of Telegram’s Mini App platform. However, the meteoric rise and fall of P2E (play-to-earn) games like Axie Infinity offer a crucial lesson hype alone isn’t enough.To build truly sustainable Telegram games, developers and game studios need to look beyond short-term gains and focus on creating engaging experiences that keep players coming back for more.

In this article, we’ll explore key lessons from the P2E era and how they can be applied to build successful Telegram games.

Lesson one – The importance of sustainable game design

One of the critical factors contributing to the decline of P2E games was their unsustainable game design.

Many P2E games prioritized token rewards or airdrops over engaging gameplay, leading to repetitive and uninspiring experiences.

Players were primarily motivated by financial gain rather than the joy of playing.

Lesson two – Building a thriving community

Community engagement is crucial for the long-term success of any game. Many P2E games only fostered a sense of community in a touch-and-go manner, leading to player isolation and disinterest.

Telegram game developers need to consider a combination of community building efforts, such as creating social features, encouraging player interaction and keeping an active feedback loop with the player base.

Lesson three – The perils of hype cycles

P2E games often fell victim to hype cycles, experiencing rapid growth followed by sharp declines as player interest waned.

To avoid this boom-and-bust pattern, Telegram games should focus on building sustainable economies that don’t rely on constant new player acquisition.

Lesson four – Prioritizing player experience

Ultimately, the success of any game hinges on an enjoyable and engaging player experience that keeps one coming back.

As mentioned earlier, P2E games often relied on tokenomics over gameplay, leading to a decline in player satisfaction.

Simplified user experience is a must to lower barriers for new players but that doesn’t mean the game experience itself should be overly simplistic.

Telegram games can take a page out of gaming console smash hits and introduce a level of sophistication, while working within limitations of the platform.

Conclusion

The rise and fall of P2E games offer valuable lessons for Telegram game developers. Strategic partnerships, continuous updates and diversified gameplay experiences are important ingredients for developers to create games that thrive in the long term.

Given the rush of gaming studios and titles into the platform, Telegram Mini App has immense potential for gaming, and by learning from the past, developers can build a vibrant and sustainable Web 3.0 gaming ecosystem.


Nic Tse is an ex-journalist, writing and editing in the fintech, lifestyle and media spaces since 2012. He’s now covering Web 3.0, blockchain, and crypto stories for aelf, a layer-one AI-enhanced blockchain.

 

Check Latest Headlines on HodlX

Follow Us on Twitter Facebook Telegram

Check out the Latest Industry Announcements
 

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.



Source link

Nic Tse

https://dailyhodl.com/2024/11/11/how-telegram-games-can-be-more-sustainable-in-the-post-p2e-era/

2024-11-12 04:40:10

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 95,480.58 1.64%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 3,283.68 1.32%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.11%
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 2.20 1.42%
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 648.77 1.69%
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 180.98 0.06%
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.312031 3.00%
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 1.00 0.12%
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 3,276.59 1.35%
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.884148 2.03%
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.244363 0.11%
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 36.55 2.22%
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 22.15 0.52%
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 5.40 2.11%
wrapped-steth
Wrapped stETH (WSTETH) $ 3,892.35 1.40%
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 95,197.51 1.90%
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000022 0.90%
sui
Sui (SUI) $ 4.32 0.79%
stellar
Stellar (XLM) $ 0.356813 0.22%
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 6.84 1.33%
hedera-hashgraph
Hedera (HBAR) $ 0.265661 4.96%
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid (HYPE) $ 29.21 9.19%
weth
WETH (WETH) $ 3,280.25 1.37%
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 446.66 2.21%
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 9.32 0.00%
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 13.91 4.37%
pepe
Pepe (PEPE) $ 0.000018 2.86%
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 99.64 1.30%
wrapped-eeth
Wrapped eETH (WEETH) $ 3,463.20 1.40%
near
NEAR Protocol (NEAR) $ 5.03 0.83%
ethena-usde
Ethena USDe (USDE) $ 0.999986 0.04%
bitget-token
Bitget Token (BGB) $ 4.13 0.41%
usds
USDS (USDS) $ 0.999312 0.10%
aptos
Aptos (APT) $ 9.29 0.90%
internet-computer
Internet Computer (ICP) $ 9.97 0.61%
aave
Aave (AAVE) $ 317.17 6.21%
crypto-com-chain
Cronos (CRO) $ 0.154475 1.71%
polygon-ecosystem-token
POL (ex-MATIC) (POL) $ 0.473691 0.60%
mantle
Mantle (MNT) $ 1.17 0.92%
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 26.06 0.27%
vechain
VeChain (VET) $ 0.045765 1.53%
render-token
Render (RENDER) $ 7.06 0.13%
whitebit
WhiteBIT Coin (WBT) $ 24.47 0.11%
mantra-dao
MANTRA (OM) $ 3.70 2.01%
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 189.41 3.39%
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 1.00 0.24%
bittensor
Bittensor (TAO) $ 452.87 0.48%
fetch-ai
Artificial Superintelligence Alliance (FET) $ 1.25 0.39%
arbitrum
Arbitrum (ARB) $ 0.747134 0.49%
ethena
Ethena (ENA) $ 1.05 4.49%